 |
| Informationen |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
Ricardo Samuel Photography |
 |
| Geschrieben am 21.03.2010 um 12:18 Uhr |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Dieser Abschnitt aus einem Artikel fasst das Ganze eigentlich gut zusammen:
"One fashion insider says agencies "know full well Richardson's predatory behavior," but that he "is tolerated because the industry folk are just sheep. There are only a handful of photographers who have the power, a handful of editors who have the power, and a handful of clients who have the power. Everyone else just follows this small group of people." In a multi-billion-dollar industry where the product is subject to a high level of uncertainty — will this be the look of the season or will that? Will this trend take off or will that one? — people tend to cluster around the handful of people who are powerful enough to actually influence outcomes. Because Richardson carries the dual stamp of editorial approval of Anna Wintour and her French counterpart Carine Roitfeld, and because he also shoots for behemoth commercial clients like H&M, his entrenchment in the fashion pantheon is virtually complete. And that, says the source, makes him practically untouchable. "Those people in power, the women, need to take their responsibility for what happens to the girls because by booking him, they are tacitly giving their approval that whatever he does is OK."
Quelle:
Jezebel Artikel TR |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Zitieren -
PN senden
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |